MLSP works with caravan and holiday park owners to investigate whether modular cabin accommodation could be a suitable addition to their site, with a structured partnership approach rather than expecting the park owner to fund and deliver every part alone.
We start with parks that have land or capacity that is not currently working as hard as it could, and an operator willing to look at what a structured accommodation project might involve.
Some conversations move forward. Many do not. Site suitability depends on location, available space, servicing, demand, planning, commercial feasibility and partner alignment. We would rather tell you early that a site is not a fit than take you through a process that leads nowhere.
MLSP is focused on Western Australian caravan and holiday park accommodation opportunities.
Adding cabins to a park traditionally means the operator carries the capital, the construction risk, the approvals workload and the disruption. MLSP’s model is designed to spread those workstreams across the parties best placed to handle them.
Underutilised areas of an existing park may be able to support additional accommodation without changing what already works.
Project structure, capital coordination and modular supply are handled as a coordinated pathway rather than left with the operator.
Modular delivery is designed to reduce on-site disruption compared with conventional construction.
Every arrangement is project-specific and settled in formal documentation. The pattern below describes how MLSP typically approaches the split.
Land, operating, revenue and approval responsibilities are project-specific and are documented before any project proceeds.
Four elements shape most park conversations. How each applies depends on the site.
Substantial parts of each cabin are produced offsite, then transported and installed. For suitable parks this can support a consistent accommodation standard and a planned installation pathway.
MLSP shapes a partnership model around the site so that land, capital, supply and delivery responsibilities sit with the parties best placed to carry them.
Installation, servicing, approvals, handover and operating responsibilities are planned around the specific site rather than applied from a template.
Where applicable to the project model, an operating layer handles booking and revenue management. The exact role and arrangement are project-specific.
A first conversation is about understanding the site, not selling a product. Location, available space, servicing, demand, planning, commercial feasibility and partner alignment all shape whether a project is worth exploring further.
Location within WA’s tourism corridors. Land that could realistically accommodate cabins. Power, water, wastewater and access. Visitation patterns and accommodation mix. The approvals context for the site. Whether the numbers can work. And whether the operator and MLSP want the same outcome.
Location, available area, current accommodation mix and what you are hoping to achieve.
We consider broad fit, location, site context, demand and partner alignment, and give you a straight answer.
If there is something worth pursuing, we move into detailed commercial, technical, planning and partnership discussion.
Capital arrangements are project-specific. MLSP explores structures that may involve aligned capital partners; no funding arrangement is assumed until the relevant parties agree in formal documentation.
Operating responsibilities are project-specific. In most conversations the park owner continues to operate the park, with the accommodation arrangement defined in the project documentation.
No. Site suitability depends on location, available space, servicing, demand, planning, commercial feasibility and partner alignment. MLSP does not work with every park.
Tell us about your park and we will give you a practical view of whether modular cabin accommodation is worth exploring further.